- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 21:44:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, we lost the definition of how to handle intrinsic track sizes during repetition when we figured out the compromise layout algorithm. I've set down what I think is a reasonable definition (basically just restoring the old behavior from my draft) in <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-3/#masonry-intrinsic-repeat>, along with an explanation of *why* the definition is the way it is. This has been spot-reviewed by @bfgeek, but not yet by the MS engineers actually doing the experimental implementation. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10869#issuecomment-2356989394 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2024 21:44:28 UTC