Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Specs that use CSS values outside of normal style rules should provide information on calc()/non-absolute length resolution in a uniform way (#10853)

To make sure I had issues filed to track them, I filed a bunch of issues on the places I have found so far (at least within CSS):

https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10876 - [css-fonts] How should relative-length values be interpreted when used in `@font-face` descriptors?
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10877 - [css-counter-styles] How should relative-length values be interpreted when used in `@counter-style` descriptors?
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10880 - [css-animations] How should relative-length values be interpreted when used in the <keyframe-selector> production in the `@keyframes` prelude?

as well as this one on whether calc() should be allowed in the `@keyframes` prelude:

https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10879 - [css-animation] Is calc() to be used for the <keyframe-selector> production in the `@keyframes` prelude?

I probably missed some, so let me know if there are any additional ones to track.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by weinig
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10853#issuecomment-2346731842 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 12 September 2024 16:20:48 UTC