- From: Sam Weinig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:37:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
weinig has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-fonts] How should relative-length values be interpreted when used in @font-face descriptors? == How should relative-length values be interpreted when used in @font-face descriptors? The grammars for @font-face descriptors, for example, ['size-adjust'](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-5/#descdef-font-face-size-adjust), allow the use of relative-length values due to the fact that `calc()` allows for them. For example, using 'size-adjust' again: ```css @font-face { size-adjust: calc(50% * sign(10em - 2px)); } ``` So the question is, what does 10em evaluate to? @font-palette-values contains this text: > [Math functions](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#math-function), such as [calc()](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#funcdef-calc), and also [var()](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-variables-1/#funcdef-var), and [env()](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-env-1/#funcdef-env), are valid within descriptor values in a [@font-palette-values](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-fonts-4/#at-ruledef-font-palette-values) rule. They are evaluated within the context of the root element. Relative units are also evaluated within the context of the root element. but I can't find any similar text for @font-face. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10876 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2024 15:37:37 UTC