- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 06:41:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
`.parent:has(> .child)` simply makes more sense than `.parent:is(> .child)` (assuming the latter is valid). Besides, `.parent:has(.child)` `.parent:is(.child)` would select different elements. `:has()` qualifies the selector subject with the relations it *has* with other elements. `:is()`/`:where()`/`:not()` qualify the selector subject with subselectors defining what it *is*. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10856#issuecomment-2339797789 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2024 06:41:37 UTC