- From: Joey Arhar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 14:52:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> After the discussion yesterday, and giving @annevk’s remarks some more thought, we actually agree that it seems best to have separate opt-in’s for the in-page control and the picker, **even in the case of `<select>`**. So despite our comments yesterday, we’re in favor of adopting @fantasai’s [proposed three bullet points](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10440#issuecomment-2303554166), as-is. As mentioned by @emilio, we will have to work through exactly what happens in the two “mismatched” cases, where the picker is native and the in-page is “base”, or vice versa. That’ll take some work, but it seems tractable. It's possible we run into some roadblocks and we'll have to revisit those here. But otherwise we'll get started thinking about it. Your input would be appreciated! Proposed resolution: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10440#issuecomment-2303554166 -- GitHub Notification of comment by josepharhar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10440#issuecomment-2331928904 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2024 14:52:47 UTC