Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-easing-2] Linear easing function requires at least two points? (#10580)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-easing-2] Linear easing function requires at least two points?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Allow linear() to have a single stop`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: reviewing the easing spec, I realized the algorithm for parsing the list of points in linear() didn't match up with how we do lists of points elsewhere, e.g. radial-gradient()<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: where we allow single points<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: or one value with two positions<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: I'm hoping for resolution that we change the linear() parsing to be similar to gradient parsing<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: allow a single value, whether 2 positoins or 1 position<br>
&lt;fantasai> TabAtkins: and do the obvious thing with that<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> the "obvious" behavior is that it's a flat line at the given value<br>
&lt;fantasai> astearns: proposed to allow linear() easing function to have a single stop<br>
&lt;fantasai> RESOLVED: Allow linear() to have a single stop<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10580#issuecomment-2330344329 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2024 23:59:42 UTC