- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:47:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Some minor things... I do not understand what the plural (emphasized below) refers to: > The `<boolean[]>` notation wraps another value type in the square brackets within it, e.g. `<boolean[ <test> ]>`, and represents that value alone as well as boolean combinations of **those values** [...] I think *"evaluates"* is more appropriate than *"represents"* (which is already used in the quote above): > The `<boolean[]>` production **represents** a true, false, or unknown value [...] I think `<boolean>` should be `<boolean[ <test> ]>` on the second line: > ``` > <boolean[ <test> ]> = not <boolean-group> | ... > <boolean-group> = <test> | ( <boolean> ) | <general-enclosed> > ``` `<size-query>` does not exist and should be [`<size-feature>`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-5/#typedef-style-feature): > ``` > <container-query> = <boolean[ <cq-test> ]> > <cq-test> = (<size-query>) | style( <style-query> ) | scroll-state( <scroll-state-query> ) > <size-query> = <boolean[ ( <size-feature> ) ]> | <size-feature> > <style-query> = <boolean[ ( <style-feature> ) ]> | <style-feature> > <scroll-state-query> = <boolean[ ( <scroll-state-feature> ) ]> | <scroll-state-feature> > ``` --- Perhaps syntax attribute names should be considered, noting that authors can now specify a value including a `<syntax>`. For example, `<number range=[0,∞] unit=px>` and `<boolean from=[<test>]` or similar. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10457#issuecomment-2449338191 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2024 08:47:41 UTC