- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:30:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> This does mean that we'll have to make the type required in order to supply a fallback (we can't otherwise tell a type and a fallback apart), but that's fine I think. I don't think that's fine? Omitting the `<syntax>` part gives you the "substitute verbatim attribute" behavior that you can't get any other way (anymore). You'd be unable to provide a fallback for that case, then. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11035#issuecomment-2448579377 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2024 22:30:58 UTC