- From: Kevin Doughty via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:49:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
KevinDoughty has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-transitions-2] transition-composition == Blending transitions using a subtract operation https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10646 and `CompositeOperation: blend` https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10927. Keywords `replace` or `blend`, default is `replace`. Would bypass css-transitions-2 section 3.1 “[Faster reversing](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-transitions-2/#reversing)” and allow multiple transitions to run simultaneously. With `blend`, any existing transtions would not get removed when starting a new transition. After switching from `replace` to `blend`, an existing transition would not get removed when starting a new transition. After switching from `blend` to `replace`, all existing transitions would get removed when starting a new transition. No interest has been shown but I’m implementing proof-of-concept anyway and need something to point to. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11087 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 25 October 2024 10:50:00 UTC