- From: Joey Arhar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:26:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Not sure where the IRC notes went, but this was in them: > ACTION: jarhar to open an issue to determine if pseudo elements (yet to be named) are tree-like or element-like I think they should be "tree-like" according to this sentence. It sounded like there was an issue raised about the CSS spec itself not being well defined enough for us to add a pseudo-element for this, and that we should be consistent between the new pseudo-elements we are adding like ::picker and this thing. I think that ::picker should be "part-like" or "element-backed" because it is a real element in the UA shadowroot which has a popover attribute and a slot inside it to slot child nodes of the select into. These new elements are intended to replace the ::before and ::after rules I proposed, and all they do is render what we want to put in the content property, so they should not be part-like or element-backed. I don't understand the concern that these aren't defined well enough. ::picker is an [element-backed pseudo-element](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-forms-1/#picker-pseudo). Is this not well defined? These new pseudo-elements should be "fully stylable pseudo-elements", [just like ::before and ::after](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-pseudo/#generated-content). This also seems very well defined to me. -- GitHub Notification of comment by josepharhar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10908#issuecomment-2435737267 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2024 16:26:49 UTC