- From: Andrew Bloyce via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 02:57:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Initially my intuitions lead me towards wanting a separate `masonry` display type. After reading the article, however, I'm strongly convinced of the integrated "Just use grid" approach. The distinction visually between a grid and a masonry layout is not sufficient for an entirely new display property. Masonry really is just a _flavour of grid_, or even a _collapsed grid_. I like the `collapse` property too. I see the distinction somewhat similar to the difference between `flex-direction: row` and `flex-direction: column`. Although arguably they could be distinct display properties I'm glad that they are both nested underneath the flex umbrella. Same does for `grid-template-rows: masonry/collapse` being a part of grid. **Just use grid!** -- GitHub Notification of comment by bloycey Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11060#issuecomment-2428107616 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2024 02:57:34 UTC