- From: Сергей via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:38:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The choice between displaying grid:masonry and template-row: masonry is difficult. It's actually quite simple. It is necessary to understand the common problem of both approaches. The fact is that both approaches are not 100%. Let's combine both approaches. - One of the approaches is logical, but more complicated for simple writing. - At the same time, the other approach is simple to write, but a little bit not logical. Let's take the best of both approaches most people are bothered by the templatecolumn:masonry (Display:GRID) scheme, what needs to be written is row-reverse. `NOT: grid-auto-flow: row-reverse;` But we will write. `grid-auto-flow: flow-reverse;` ### Now it will not be confusing that when specifying the direction of the columns we write lines, now we will just write a change in direction. ## Let's take it from both ways. -- GitHub Notification of comment by korenevskiy Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041#issuecomment-2415289921 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2024 22:38:28 UTC