- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 15:37:04 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Yes, if an emoji upgrade is not intended or desired, `font-variant-emoji:` still has values `unicode` and `normal` and I think the value `unicode` matches what you want here. `font-variant-emoji: unicode` doesn't achieve what @yisibl wants here, because the up-arrow is U+2B06. Checking Unicode's emoji-data.txt, it has the Emoji property: > 2B05..2B07 ; Emoji # E0.6 [3] (⬅️..⬇️) left arrow..down arrow but does not have Emoji_Presentation: > 27BF ; Emoji_Presentation # E1.0 [1] (➿) double curly loop > 2B1B..2B1C ; Emoji_Presentation # E0.6 [2] (⬛..⬜) black large square..white large square so its default presentation will be the `text` form. In terms of the Unicode Emoji and Emoji_Presentation properties, U+2B06 UPWARDS BLACK ARROW has the same properties as the ASCII digits, so it is expected that `font-variant-emoji` will affect them in the same way. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11014#issuecomment-2402677143 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2024 15:37:05 UTC