- From: Yusuf KaYeht via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:56:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Im also definitely going with `display: masonry;`. Even tho it would bring even more css declarations that might make it confusing to some people. Like ``grid-template-rows` to `masonry-template-tracks` With `display: grid; grid-template-rows: masonry;` (or as I would prefer `collapse` as the keyword) is a lot simpler to remember for horizontal and vertical layouts (`template-rows` / `template-columns`). But as long as we have the same capabilities and features with the “display: masonry” approach, and even save the developers implementing it some headaches and browser performance, I'm all for it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Yusuf-KaYeht Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041#issuecomment-2396592300 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 7 October 2024 10:56:47 UTC