- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 21:56:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Actually I think these just need to be defined as math functions. As it says in the spec, `progress()` is just syntax sugar for a calc(), and the other two progress functions are morally equivalent; they *would* just be syntax sugar if we instead had a function which just resolved to an MQ/CQ value. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10983#issuecomment-2389760336 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2024 21:56:07 UTC