[csswg-drafts] [css-color-5] Is relative colors "omitted alpha" rule useful? (#10991)

emilio has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-color-5] Is relative colors "omitted alpha" rule useful? ==
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-5/#rcs-intro says:

> If the alpha value of the relative color is omitted, it defaults to that of the [origin color](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-color-5/#origin-color) (rather than defaulting to 100%, as it does in the absolute syntax).

That was a bit unexpected to me, and feels it could be for authors as well. Given authors can just type an extra `a` on the color, is it really worth the confusion?

cc @svgeesus @weinig 

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10991 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2024 12:04:23 UTC