- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 12:06:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cdoublev has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-values-5] Should progress functions have a calculation tree as their internal representation? == Like math functions. This would help to clarify: - how to [determine their type](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#determine-the-type-of-a-calculation) when they are used in a calculation - whether the result of `progress()` can be unwrapped during the [simplification](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-simplification) of a calculation tree - whether their resolved value should be [clamped](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-range) to the range allowed in the target context - whether `calc(progress(...))` should [serialize](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#serialize-a-calculation-tree) as is or with `progress(...)` as a component of a declared value Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10979 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2024 12:06:45 UTC