- From: 一丝 via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 07:23:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
To recap the history of `transition-behavior` being added to the specification, @fantasai [proposed](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8857#issuecomment-1572569359) a `transition-discrete` global property. I think it's conceptually similar to the current size `interpolation` property, but I don't know why it wasn't chosen in the end. At @josepharhar a [list of names used to be provided](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8857#issuecomment-1591335579): 1. 😄transition-mode 2. 🎉transition-type 3. ❤️transition-animation-type 4. 🚀transition-discrete 5. 👀transition-interpolation From today's perspective, it seems that `transition-interpolation` is more appropriate (Is it still possible to change the name?), I think the `transition-behavior` name is a failure, many people seeing it for the first time can't tell from the name what the property is used for. I hate adding `transition-behavior: allow-discrete` every time I need a transition, I really wish there was a global property that could control it. ---- So, I propose that the new name be **`size-interpolation`**, and the default value is `normal` or `auto`, which needs to be selected. -- GitHub Notification of comment by yisibl Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10294#issuecomment-2128783184 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 24 May 2024 07:23:57 UTC