- From: Mason Freed via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 22:37:38 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I believe the original naming of `inset-area` came from when the spec used to make `inset-area` reset the `inset` values to `anchor(...)`, where the name made sense, but it no longer makes sense with the current definition. I thought it came from the fact that you were picking an **area** within the **inset-** modified-containing-block? In terms of explaining what this property does for developers, I actually think it's pretty important to tie it to `inset`s, so they know it lives within the IMCB. Calling it `position-area` feels more confusing actually. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mfreed7 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10209#issuecomment-2125887813 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2024 22:37:39 UTC