- From: Tim Nguyen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 22:19:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@una The syntax for the shorthand could be `static | relative | sticky | [ [ absolute | fixed ] || <'position-area'> || <'position-anchor'> ]` or something similar. Or at the very least, `position-area` could be reset-only subproperty of `position`, like `position-anchor` currently is. Anyway, I'm advocating for the `position-` prefix here, mainly because @fantasai just taught me the spec allows you to use `inset-area` along with `inset` which wasn't clear to me from the naming, e.g.: ``` inset-area: bottom left; inset: 2px; ``` will move the containing block to the bottom left of the anchor, then inset 2px from that containing block. It would be a lot more explicit that this is how things work if the property was named `position-area`. With the name `inset-area`, I have a tendency to think that `inset-area` resets `inset` or vice-versa and that only one of the two apply. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nt1m Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10209#issuecomment-2125871033 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2024 22:19:32 UTC