- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 09:09:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@fantasai's proposal looks acceptable to me, although including the "leading" declaration list in `cssRules` is problematic, as it requires a new use-counter and waiting many months for good data. > It serializes as a raw declaration list. That means it won't round-trip "structurally", like we talked about before. But maybe that's not so bad. > We would also be OK with alternative solutions that don't introduce an at-rule, such as [...] including only interleaved declaration lists in .cssRules. In that case, I suggest that we resolve on the proposal, minus the change to `cssRules` for now. "Making [cssRules] a comprehensive and consistent representation of all the contents of the style rule" does makes sense to me, but it would be nice if we could consider this _separately_ in order to deal with the most urgent part ASAP. > Extend .insertRule() to parse declarations (or add .insertDeclarations()) It makes sense, but actually we could do this separately as well? -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10234#issuecomment-2122146046 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2024 09:09:27 UTC