- From: vmpstr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 15:19:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I agree that the circularity is a problem that needs to be solved for option 1 (which is why I haven't mentioned it, but did think about it). Auto grouping makes the example above awkward to express, since you need to modify your dom to encompass some things but not others. I like option 3, just have both: by default `view-transition-tree` establishes a grouping for descendant vt elements -- this solves a lot of cases without needing to specify parents on each descendant -- and have the ability to explicitly name an _ancestor_ with `view-transition-parent`. Note that the circularity is resolved in that the named parent has to be an ancestor of this element, otherwise the name is invalid -- GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334#issuecomment-2112840624 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2024 15:19:47 UTC