- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 01:38:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
fantasai has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-anchor-position] position-try: inset-area() does not reflect CSSWG resolution == The [minutes of the CSSWG resolution](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9196#issuecomment-1942197882) to add `position-try` include a resolution to add the `inset-area` syntax into the [proposal](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9196#issuecomment-1912788896). However, what got edited in was not what was discussed (adding `<'inset-area'>` as an option in the try list), but a [new `inset-area()` function](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#position-try-options). This is inconsistent both with how we import syntaxes across properties in general (we don't wrap them in a function) and with the WG resolution as most reasonably interpreted (given the logged discussion and the resolution). Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10320 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 13 May 2024 01:38:31 UTC