- From: Khushal Sagar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 22:04:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
khushalsagar has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-anchor-positioning-1] [scroll-animations-1] Scoping names on elements based on tree scope == Both https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10145 and https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10303 are tackling how view-transition-name applies across tree scopes. But the conceptual problem seems common across other features like anchor positioning or scroll driven animations which have a similar pattern of assigning names to elements which are later used for animations/layout tied to a tree scope. Please add if I missed a feature! Filing this issue to decide whether each feature needs to define their own behaviour when dealing with shadow DOM or do the choices we make on the VT issues make sense across all such naming properties in CSS. @astearns. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10304 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2024 22:04:41 UTC