Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] Renaming `masonry` keyword (#9733)

The more I read the various discussion points, the more I get the feeling that adding a whole other display type seems to be overkill.  It's a whole other faction where we'd have to learn the nuances and differences (an argument could be made that masonry is closer to flexbox than grid due to it's unidirectional nature), and an avenue where maintenance efforts would be duplicated for those features which cross the types.  Keeping everything within the grid reduces maintenance efforts, lessens the chance of inconsistent behaviors to due things not being maintained in both situations, etc.

But I admit to not caring for the term "off" for some reason.  Just seems clunky because you're really not turning them off but ignoring them instead.  The term ignore seems more accurate to the nature of the effort.

```
grid-template-rows: ignore /* for vertical masonry layouts */

or

grid-template-columns: ignore /* for horizontal masonry layouts */
```

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by davemaxwell77
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9733#issuecomment-2090806502 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 2 May 2024 15:26:37 UTC