- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 21:25:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > These glyph-level forms of ink overflow are conceptually quite distinct from the character-level ink overflow that CSS Text 3's hanging glyphs create, and the two cases should be addressed separately. > > I agree they are different. Are you just saying the two cases need separate spec text to account for them specially in defining the extent of ink overflow? Yes, to the extent that the spec aims to define/explain ink overflow, the two cases should be described separately; in particular, the current PR https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9842 seems to use the italic-*f* example as though it were related to what CSS Text 3 calls "hanging glyphs", which I think is confusing. > (Also, both contribute to ink overflow--do you agree?) They do, though because of the different levels at which they operate, it's conceivable they might be handled differently by an implementation. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10066#issuecomment-2089163901 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2024 21:25:16 UTC