Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade][css-syntax] New `!revertable` flag to mark a declaration as "can be reverted when IACVT" (#10443) from Lea Verou via GitHub on 2024-06-16 (public-css-archive@w3.org from June 2024)

From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:07:17 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-2170997968-1718500035-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Most aliases are known in advance. The only complication with the issue you're pointing out is that the aliasing can be dynamic. These cases are sufficiently few they can just be stored in a data structure (if they aren’t already).

Nothing is polluting `CSSStyleDeclaration`, please read the first post more carefully?
But as a general principle, the ergonomics of the language itself are more important than CSS OM ergonomics. That doesn't mean the CSS OM doesn't matter, but the weightings of tradeoffs are different.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10443#issuecomment-2170997968 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Sunday, 16 June 2024 01:07:18 UTC