- From: Bramus via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:18:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > So clipping wouldn’t happen automatically? Authors would need to set overflow: clip on the group pseudo if they want it? > > yup. OK, then I guess a valid question here is: when an authors opts-in to preserve the tree, do they expect things to be clipped by the parent group in that case? If they do, it would be a bit weird to require authors to do both preserve-tree + manually clip the group … which would make the case for the `::view-transition-container` pseudo mentioned before. It would wrap one or more `::view-transition-group` pseudos and its sole function would be to clip its contents. Also: that `view-transition-overflow` I suggested earlier would be set on the container (the one that also gets the `view-transition-tree`), not the children – not sure if that was clearly communicated. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bramus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334#issuecomment-2165359804 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2024 11:18:08 UTC