Re: [csswg-drafts] Alternate masonry path forward (#9041)

Reponding to @frivoal:

> I suspect the answer might be: not if you want a good design, but if fallback is more of an afterthought, falling back to an identically set up grid is often good enough. I don't know how much this expectation matches author experience at large.

From my experience, in most cases, falling back from an intentional design of a masonry to a grid is not going to be acceptable. For example, in the cases I can account for, if a user asked for a masonry then they want that to be the layout, regardless of whether it will be done via CSS or not.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ydaniv
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041#issuecomment-2163049807 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2024 13:44:07 UTC