- From: Khushal Sagar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 17:31:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm having a hard time convincing myself that there's use-cases beyond ink overflow from box decorations because conceptually this feature is trying to "get back" the clipping which is already being applied by the container. Maybe an example would help? Here's how I'm reasoning about it. A clip on the container will clip all its contents, that's the clipping we want to retain in the pseudo-tree. So if granular style capture makes it so the images only have the element contents (all the box decoration is styles on the group pseudo), then an `overflow: clip` on the group or image-pair pseudo would also clip just the element contents which is the desired behaviour. If there's other use-cases then I'm ok with a new pseudo to handle this. But if granular capture addresses all the use-cases then I am hesitant to add a new pseudo, mostly to avoid making the API more complicated. It feels like a short term workaround we'll need to unnecessarily maintain after granular capture. -- GitHub Notification of comment by khushalsagar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334#issuecomment-2150595194 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2024 17:31:37 UTC