- From: vmpstr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 16:52:22 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
vmpstr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == Should view-transition-group contain or <ident> take precedence == In https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334, we resolved that we will have the following property: ```css view-transition-group: normal | <ident> | nearest | contain ``` Consider the following structure ``` A /* view-transition-name: foo */ | - B /* view-transition-group: contain */ | - C /* view-transition-group: foo */ ``` Here `B` should contain all descendants and `C` is saying it wants to be contained by `A`. What should be the behavior? We can either say that `B`'s `contain` wins and we don't respect `C`'s desire to group under `A`, or `B`'s `contain` does not contain `C` because it has an explicit reference to `A`. I'm leaning towards the latter here loosely because it feels like `C`'s "specificifity" of ident is higher than `B`'s desire to contain everything. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10639 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 29 July 2024 16:52:23 UTC