- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 19:28:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thinking about this again, `view-transition-class` is not exactly a name-reference, but rather a name by itself, and the reference is in the pseudo-elements. It's more equivalent to container queries where the query has to be below the definition of the name. I think the right approach here would be that `view-transition-class` is a scoped name, and is read from the same scope as the `view-transition-name`. The only "quirk" about this is that the shadow DOM can define `view-transition-class: none !important` or some such and make a `::part` not receive a `view-transition-class`. Perhaps that's OK. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10529#issuecomment-2254620235 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 28 July 2024 19:28:09 UTC