- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:49:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
noamr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-view-transitions-2] `view-transition-group` and tree-scoping == Follow up on #10334 It's unclear how to specify `view-transition-group` in terms of shadow trees. Sure, we can make the `<<custom-ident>>` a tree-scoped reference, which means it can't reference names from a different scope. However, what about `nearest` keyword etc? Keywords are not usually "tree-scoped". Since `view-transition-name` is tree-scoped and `view-transition-group` doesn't make much sense in isolation from it, suggesting that both idents and keywords in `view-transition-group` are tree-scoped, and this property always resolves to `none` inside a shadow-tree. //cc @khushalsagar @vmpstr See also #10529 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10633 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 26 July 2024 16:49:08 UTC