Re: [csswg-drafts] Do we need :focus-visible-within ? (#3080)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `Do we need :focus-visible-within ?`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;emilio> q+<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: Brian added a comment just asking to close the issue (and open a different one about shadow dom)<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> dbaron: I think we should punt, people missing probably have strong opinions<br>
&lt;astearns> ack emilio<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: would be great if those strong opinions were written in to the issue<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> emilio: I know focus does propagate out from shadow trees<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> emilio: :has() mostly covers this, just not when shadow dom is involved<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> emilio: And for that, :focus works, but :focus-visible... probably not?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> emilio: I think moving it out of the shadow tree would cause undesired outlines<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> emilio: So main question is if people are having to work around this with JS we probably want something like this, but...<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> emilio: I don't see a wya of making it work with shadow dom<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> emilio: Slgihtly against closing because there's a use-case that seems valid, and don't see how it can be addressed without this<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: So punt on this today. keep the agenda tag on it? or solicit opinions first?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: Slgihtly inclined to take the tag off<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> dbaron: I think taking it off is fine, tho I think i'm in the opposite camp of Brian (i think we should add it)<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3080#issuecomment-2233759211 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2024 16:51:26 UTC