- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 17:04:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
We've discussed something related in view-transitions: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10145#issuecomment-2206800759. To reiterate: we want to make sure that decisions about name encapsulation are consistent across these features. Currently the direction for anchor positioning seems to be to use the flattened tree and have a CSS-based scoping property (`anchor-scope`). If this is the direction then we should do the same for view transitions, and revert the decision to have view-transition-names tree-scoped. CCing @fantasai, @nt1m and @annevk, as I feel that having a consistent view about this problem from Apple would be very helpful to the discussion. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10325#issuecomment-2206808099 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2024 17:04:22 UTC