- From: Tim Nguyen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 23:25:22 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Regardless of shorthanding, I think we should do this. It's inconsistent that this is named `inset-area` while all properties that control the containing block are prefixed with `position-`. The shorthanding is a good addition, but my main motivation for this renaming is to make it clear that this changes the containing block, and not the `inset` properties themselves. @astearns Would it be possible to add this to the next agenda? -- GitHub Notification of comment by nt1m Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10209#issuecomment-2204675879 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2024 23:25:23 UTC