- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:17:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I think that this needs to be expanded and that "appropriate initial value" defined. Ah, I see. In https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9a6e7049b9f096a2551af0ee546241da28433c99 the initial value was "normal" for all three `font-weight`, `font-style` and `font-width` and that would be used for font selection purposes. So "appropriate initial value" made sense. But in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/36f80a0c77378ee511f1f67ecb08182be3cfeb91 that was changed to `auto` because of https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2485#issuecomment-431893656 so now it needs to explicitly say 'normal`, for font selection. And for variation handling, it means no clamping is applied. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9485#issuecomment-1906852670 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2024 20:17:38 UTC