- From: WebMechanic via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 14:58:29 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
so I did not follow all the threads surrounding this or have read all minutes... I would be a user of this feature. FWIW a syntax like `@supports feature(gap-on-display-flex)` seem very counter intuitive and artificial in nature. It requires learning a (albeit limited) vocabulary to describe a problem, requires maintenance (in code and documentation) and specific documentation (lists) that would be hard to "guess" where to find. And whomever writes a blog post would also need to mention these magic keywords and all existing documentation on either the main or supplemental feature would be outdated. Some generic feature test on the other hand like `@supports (gap: 1px) with (display: flex)` seems more intuitive to me as it describes spot on the query of a problem that needs solving: _does this work in the context of that?_ Thank you folks for your great work! Have a nice time. -- GitHub Notification of comment by WebMechanic Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3559#issuecomment-1902663127 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 21 January 2024 14:58:32 UTC