Closed: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Is it intentional that :has(:is()) is different from :has()? (#9422)

astearns closed this issue. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9422

-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2024 18:36:42 UTC