- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:49:03 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think it can be confusing that the meaning changes depending on the context. Wouldn't it have been better to just drop > If a [default namespace](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-namespaces-3/#default-namespace) is declared, [compound selectors](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#compound) without [type selectors](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#type-selector) in them still only match elements in that default namespace. Authors could use an explicit `*` to restrict to the default namespace if they wanted. Possibly not web-compatible to change now, but I think default namespaces aren't actually used that much... -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5684#issuecomment-1894699872 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2024 23:49:06 UTC