- From: Jake Archibald via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 10:41:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@fantasai > comment from someone in thread to introduce shorthand for view-transition-name and view-transition-class I'm not against a shorthand here, but I'm not sure it would be useful. In this thread, code examples are like: ```css .box-1 { view-transition-name: box-1; view-transition-class: box; } .box-2 { view-transition-name: box-2; view-transition-class: box; } ``` But I think real usage will be more like: ```css .box-1 { view-transition-name: box-1; } .box-2 { view-transition-name: box-2; } .box { view-transition-class: box; } ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakearchibald Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8319#issuecomment-1876878932 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2024 10:42:00 UTC