- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 23:18:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I still slightly prefer the initially suggested `background-layer` over the others. Though I am ok with `background-overlay`. I am ruling out some for myself here, which I think don't fit well. * `background-pattern` While "pattern" indicates that the solid color is excluded, it somewhat sounds like it allows creating simple patterns and not to the images. * `background-sheet` * `background-screen` "screen" refers to the monitor in virtually all contexts, not to a layer. * `background-cover` "cover" rather has a meaning of a single thing, like a book cover, not of multiple layers. * `background-slice` We already have `border-image-slice` which refers to slicing an image. So "slice" here may rather confuse authors. * `background-image-stack` This conveys the idea of different image layers, though it looks like a longhand of `background-image` while it actually is a _shorthand_ for it and the other `background-*` properties. * `background-media` "media" sounds like it covers images, videos and other types of media. * `background-image-list` Same reason as with `background-image-stack`. * `background-image-layer` Same reason as with `background-image-stack`. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9083#issuecomment-1873520540 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 1 January 2024 23:18:40 UTC