- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 22:31:17 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I want to re-open this for further discussion. The allowed control point values depend on the command affinity (the to/by), so if the control points come first, you have to parse the control points in a relaxed way, and then go back and validate them after you hit the `to` or `by`. This doesn't feel great implementation-wise, but it also feels odd as an author to write out control points before you've written the `to` or `by` that determines how those control points are interpreted. > > I thus propose that we go back to strict ordering of points and control points in `curve` commands. To be clear, you're proposing that the strict ordering would be to have the end point first, correct? I'm OK with this -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10666#issuecomment-2542487994 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 13 December 2024 22:31:18 UTC