- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 06:45:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
fantasai has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-inline-3] -top/-bottom vs -over/-under == We historically have had top/bottom values for `vertical-align` etc; but in vertical text these don't make a whole lot of sense, since they're on the left or right of the line. For the `<text-edge>` values introduced by https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10713 , what do we want to do? * Keep `text-top` and `text-bottom`, introduce `ideographic-top` and `ideographic-bottom`, for consistency. * Keep `text-top` and `text-bottom`, introduce `ideographic-over` and `ideographic-under, keeping consistency with existing keywords, but establishing a new pattern going forward. * Use `text-over` and `text-under`, breaking consistency with `vertical-align`; and introduce `ideographic-over` and `ideographic-under`. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11365 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 13 December 2024 06:45:25 UTC