- From: gitspeaks via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:20:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Aside from being verbose/'over-complicated', is there anything incorrect in the following definition? Is there a specific example where it fails? "Collapse through": Margins are said to collapse through if either: a) The top and bottom margins of the same element collapse because the element does not establish a new block formatting context, has a computed min-height of zero, a computed height of zero or auto, and contains no in-flow children. or b) The margin-top of one element and the margin-bottom of another element adjoin the combined margin of an intermediary element whose margins themselves have collapsed through. or c) The margin-top and margin-bottom of the same element adjoin the combined margin of an intermediary child element whose margins themselves have collapsed through. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gitspeaks Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11306#issuecomment-2511824386 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 2 December 2024 15:20:27 UTC