Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transition-2] Should non-default `view-transition-group` act like `contain`? (#10780)

I still think it's somewhat confusing, plus there may be a scenario for an element to both a containing parent and a contained child. 
I'm also not sure a the combo idea, since it also makes sense to have `contain` by itself. 
Feels like it's either a case of a longhand or two separate properties stuffed together into one, kind of where it started, right? 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ydaniv
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10780#issuecomment-2322382644 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 30 August 2024 21:47:01 UTC