- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:33:17 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> If I understand it correctly, the proposal to handle spanning items, is that [...] @Loirooriol Yes, that's a great example. > [repeat(8, min-content) ](https://codepen.io/SebastianZ1983/pen/vYqrEJr) > Tracks and gaps should collapse so that the result is the same as if gap weren't set. I think you are wrong here @SebastianZ. If you requested gaps, then we must put one at least between 5/6. > [repeat(4, 100px min-content)](https://codepen.io/SebastianZ1983/pen/XWLYJZM) > Tracks 2, 4, 6, and 8 should collapse. What if track 7 doesn't have enough space for item D? I think we would want to avoid automatically creating overflow, especially since the author's specified design avoids such overflow. > [200px 1fr 1fr repeat(5, 100px) with restricted container width](https://codepen.io/SebastianZ1983/pen/ExBRadw) >Tracks 2 and 3 should collapse. I agree strongly with @Loirooriol that we should not make track collapsing depend on the available space. If nothing else, it creates a discontinuity. Thanks @Loirooriol and @SebastianZ for all the examples. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5813#issuecomment-2312742767 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2024 14:33:18 UTC