- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 01:05:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Perhaps a special case: I think it should probably be clear that `:has()` isn't allowed; it's probably not testable today but it could be in the future if we introduce something equivalent to what was allowed in early `:has()` drafts by `:has(:scope:hover)` (which is roughly equivalent to `:is(:hover)`). -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10787#issuecomment-2311374953 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2024 01:05:40 UTC