Re: [csswg-drafts] need definition of which pseudo-classes can follow :part() that is sufficient to produce interoperability (#10787)

Perhaps a special case:  I think it should probably be clear that `:has()` isn't allowed; it's probably not testable today but it could be in the future if we introduce something equivalent to what was allowed in early `:has()` drafts by `:has(:scope:hover)` (which is roughly equivalent to `:is(:hover)`).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10787#issuecomment-2311374953 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2024 01:05:40 UTC