Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transition-2] Should non-default `view-transition-group` act like `contain`? (#10780)

The reason we added `contain` was so not all children have to set `view-transition-group` for an example like [this](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334#issuecomment-2111871610).

Can you expand on what you're proposing with "nearest and <custom-ident> would also act as contain". I'm guessing `<custom-indent>` implies the parent specifying the list of children nesting to it. I feel like that defeats the purpose of having `contain`...

And not sure how `nearest` would be used if it's on the parent.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by khushalsagar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10780#issuecomment-2310826490 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 26 August 2024 18:35:46 UTC