- From: Anne van Kesteren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 07:19:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think requiring `:popover-open` to match would very much go against our earlier decision not to reuse `::part()`. Whether or not `::picker(select)` points to an HTML element with a `popover` attribute set is an implementation detail. If implementations want to implement `::picker(select)` without an element node they should be allowed to do that. `::picker(select)` needs to behave like popovers in a number of respects, but it shouldn't be required to use the exact same mechanism underneath. Now I suppose we could update the `:popover-open` requirements to say that `::picker(select)` also needs to be matched, but that seems kinda pointless to me given that we already plan to add `:open` to `select` elements. -- GitHub Notification of comment by annevk Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10775#issuecomment-2309512501 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 26 August 2024 07:19:34 UTC